| Deviant Login | Shop | Join deviantART for FREE  |
Take the Tour  |
| Designs & Interfaces / Web Interfaces | ©2007-2013 ~arEa50oNe |
The Journal Portal
Browse Journals |
Polls |
deviantART [dee·vee·un'nt·ART]
Keep in Touch!
|
Deviousness `anmari has been spreading her infectious positivity throughout our community for over 6 years. Throughout this time Ana has been at the core of all things devious, passionately developing an eclectic gallery, helping organise devmeets, participating in chat events and also recently completed dedicating her time as a Community Volunteer. We are absolutely delighted to bestow the Deviousness Award for May 2013 to `anmari, congratulations! Read More
|
Sta.sh
looks nice, i like the green. colour is always nice. however it might clash with some photos.
Pretty cool!!
first of all i must agree with the problem of the green color, it really should be white.
the second that i hate, is that fucking 0.000001 px font-sized text-looking whatever below the menu items on the top.. comeon, what the fuck is that? it doesnt have any meaning, and thats why it is ridiculous. i always thought about webdesign, that it is about how you arrange objects on the page, and how they look like, what do they mean, and its NOT about meaningless things. you must make a design for those things that u want to display, and must not display meaningless things to aim a better design. anyway, its even not better with those whatever things.
and the third problem is that on the middle of the page you speak about "unique style" and "custom imagery", but this is undoubtedly a template site, with no title, no company name, no slogan and no purpose.. design is for a concrete, specified purpose, and it always needs to tell something, communicate visually with the user, and be unique according to other sites, but if there is nothing to communicate, then what good is it????
if you make a template site for a photographer that can be re-used for anybody, than you communicate that there is no difference between different photographers' work. you just simply underestimate their work, and as a matter of fact, the whole photo art.
but did you misspell 'and' in the text on the main image?